The Power of Ridicule
F
|
or almost a century and a half, observers of Pennsylvania’s “Molly Maguire” history have
characterized the Irish Catholic men prosecuted by the commonwealth’s coal and
railroad interests as rough mineworkers who had little knowledge of the social
and political structures of their community, their region, or even their
country. Much of this distortion arises from the original telling of this
history, based in large part on archived reports and courtroom testimony
offered by Pinkerton operative James McParlan.
McParlan
went to great lengths to portray these Irishmen, all officers or members of the
Ancient Order of Hibernian (AOH) benevolent association, as rough terrorists with ties to alleged Irish methods of retributive violence. Special
prosecutors, newsmen countrywide, and writers of history all relied on
McParlan’s testimony. More than three decades after the Pinkerton spun his
courtroom theories, even a prominent advocate of organized labor
believed Pennsylvania’s “Mollies” guilty of the crimes charged against them. But buried under all of the “Molly Maguire” rhetoric lies evidence that at least five Hibernians charged as “Mollies” had served in their communities as school directors.
Correspondence of former
U.S. Congressman John McKeon, published in New York the
month McParlan entered the coal region, opens a new window onto the climate of
the times. McKeon’s comments help explain how Irish Catholic miners and businessmen
with a sophisticated understanding of their community, their region, their
county’s political structures, and the day’s complex social and industrial
issues, came to be cartooned for more than a century under the “Molly Maguire”
caricature.
A
Compact Battalion
I
|
n 1873, two years before
railroad president Franklin Gowen began his so-called “Molly Maguire”
prosecutions in Pennsylvania, former U.S. Congressman John McKeon wrote a
letter to the New York Herald. The Herald titled McKeon’s letter “TRIUMPH
OF THE BIGOTS.”
New
York Herald, October 11, 1873
McKeon warned the Herald’s readers of a resurgence in nativism, the decades-old movement that strove to
keep Irish Catholics out of political office. The “Know-Nothing”
movement McKeon described grew out of the American Party, whose members’ call for
native-born citizens to arm themselves against immigrants had led to a number of
violent clashes during the 1840s. During the 1850s, the “Know-Nothings”
claimed a million members. In 1856, the American Party backed Millard Fillmore’s unsuccessful presidential candidacy.[1]
In his letter published less than two decades later,
McKeon quoted a New York Times editorial printed after a recent election in fall 1873. The Times editorial encapsulated the nativists’ fears: “‘Our political power follows
population, and the result is that the governing power of this portion of the
State, and in consequence the whole State, is fast centering itself in the
ranks of the lowest and most ignorant classes of the whole community—the Irish
Catholic laborers and tenement-house population of New York and its vicinity,
led by shrewd native demagogues.’”[2]
“The same article,” McKeon said
of the Times editorial, “charged that
the Irish Catholics aimed at the absolute possession of the revenues of this metropolis
… that they aimed a blow at our American schools, and added, ‘that unless some
great revolution should break out the Board of Education of this city would be
thoroughly Roman Catholic, as Tammany is now.’”
McKeon quoted a number of
ministers who shared the Times’s fears.
In addressing his congregation, Rev. Hambler “launched into a furious tirade
against ‘Papists,’ charging them with image worship and passionately dwelling
on the cruelties of the Inquisition.”
“‘What care these men what
becomes of the nation?’” Rev. Asten asked his congregation. “‘It is ours to cry
the alarm. … The remedy for this is to vote for those you have a right to know
will be the most patriotic, without regard to color, religion or politics. But
I can’t see how a Roman Catholic can come up to this.’”
Rev. Boole declared he would “‘not vote for any Roman Catholic, since it is the avowed purpose of that Church
and its adherents to place the Church above the State.’” Boole advised his congregation: “‘The public
schools are now in the hands of drunken trustees, who ought to be in primary
classes learning to read; and the Bible is being put out of the schools as fast
as they can do it.’”
“‘They work together as a
compact battalion under able and audacious leaders,’” the Times editorial said of Irish Catholics. “‘They control in the city
administration enormous sums of money. Where they are deficient in votes they
can create them. The timid or the ambitious Americans who have belonged to the
same party organization have not nerve or principle enough to separate
themselves from these useful associates, whom socially they despise.’”
Two years later, in this climate of fear, distrust, and loathing, Franklin Gowen began his “Molly Maguire” arrests.
More
Than a Century of Distortion
T
|
hree and a half decades after John McKeon warned of the resurgent dangers of nativism, Eugene
Debs, founding member of the Industrial Workers of the World and five-time presidential
candidate for the Socialist Party of America, published an address in Appeal to Reason. Titled “The First
Martyrs of the American Class Struggle,” Debs’s speech paid tribute to
Pennsylvania’s alleged “Molly Maguires” and their efforts, however misguided in
Debs’s view, on behalf of labor.
“All were ignorant, rough and
uncouth, born of poverty and buffeted by the merciless tides of fate and
chance,” Debs said in 1907 of Pennsylvania’s alleged “Mollies.” “To resist the
wrongs of which they and their fellow workers were victims and to protect
themselves against the brutality of their bosses, according to their crude
notions, was the prime object of the organization of the ‘Molly Maguires.’
Nothing could have been farther from their intention than murder or crime. It
is true that their methods were drastic, but it must be remembered that their
lot was hard and brutalizing; that they were the neglected children of poverty,
the products of a wretched environment.”[3]
Historian Kevin Kenny, writing
in 1998, expanded Debs’s characterization: “Significant numbers of the Irish
immigrants in Pennsylvania came from a preliterate Gaelic culture, marking them
off as fundamentally different not only from the Welsh and the English, but
also from the people of eastern and southern Ireland, where much of the
population had little or no knowledge of the Irish language. It was these
Irish-speakers, and not the Irish in general, who became ‘Molly Maguires’ in
Pennsylvania.”[4]
“The Irish-speaking Molly
Maguires who made their way to Pennsylvania … stand out as quite anomalous in
the American context,” Kenny added. “Because of their language, culture, and
customs, they were the archetypal ‘wild Irish,’ noticeably and ominously
different from the mass of Irish immigrants.”[5]
In an Oxford University Press
blog posted in December 2013, Kenny noted that Pennsylvania’s “Mollies” “took their name from a rural secret society in Ireland.” In
this short piece, Kenny also gave the prosecution argument that hanged
twenty-one men in five counties and sent dozens more to prison: “Like
their Irish counterparts, they were led by tavern keepers and called on strangers
from neighboring ‘lodges’ of the AOH to carry out beatings and killings,
pledging to return the favor at a later date.”[6]
Encycopedia.com echoes Debs’s
and Kenny’s characterizations: “Every movement has
its legends, and none is more compelling or controversial in the American labor
movement than the group of rough, preliterate Irish immigrants known as the
Molly Maguires.”[7]
The notion of Pennsylvania’s alleged “Mollies” as rough, illiterate, or
preliterate mineworkers has survived into the twenty-first century.
But at least five
of the Ancient Order of Hibernian (AOH) men charged as Pennsylvania’s “Mollies”
had been elected, before their arrests, to the office of school director. Their
election to this office of responsibility and trust played directly into nativist
fears of Irish Catholic political supremacy expressed in the New York Times in fall 1873.
In October 1873, John McKeon wrote an additional letter to the New York Herald. In it, the Irishman warned: “a
crusade has been regularly planned and organized against Irish adopted citizens
and their descendants and against those professing the Roman Catholic religion.
That crusade is now in successful movement, and, unless checked, must result in
the humiliation and trampling under foot of some of our best citizens.”[8]
Two weeks after the Herald published McKeon’s letter, Pinkerton operative James McParlan, at the request of railroad president Franklin Gowen, entered Pennsylvania’s coal region to infiltrate AOH lodges undercover.
Two weeks after the Herald published McKeon’s letter, Pinkerton operative James McParlan, at the request of railroad president Franklin Gowen, entered Pennsylvania’s coal region to infiltrate AOH lodges undercover.
Some of the Coal Region’s Best Citizens
J
|
ohn J. Slattery,
Tuscarora
In June 1872, a
correspondent who signed himself “Democrat” wrote to the
editor of the Pottsville Standard to endorse the
candidacy of AOH member John Slattery for the office of register. “Mr.
Slattery is a Democrat of the first water, and has attested his devotion to the
principles of Democracy by many sacrifices of time and money, he has made for
the good of the party,” the correspondent wrote four years before Slattery’s
arrest as an alleged “Molly.” “The estimation in which he is held by the people
of his own Township where he is known, may be learned from the fact that at
different times he served them as Tax Collector, Treasurer, School Director,
Auditor, Supervisor, Assessor and Town Clerk, in all of which offices he gave
general satisfaction.”[9]
John J. Slattery |
Pottsville
Standard, June 29, 1872
A resolution from the
Workingmen’s Benevolent Association (WBA), District Number 10, Tuscarora,
offered in support of Slattery’s candidacy for register shows this alleged
“Molly” as a union organizer: “Mr. Slattery was one of the most active in organizing this district of the W.B.A., at
a time when unionism met with formidable opposition from those whose interest
it was to crush it in its infancy, and, whereas, he was our first
President and first member who represented us on the County Executive Board and
is yet a member in good standing, and
an honest advocate of Union principles, therefore be it Resolved, That we recognize in him those qualifications of
character and ability, that should always be combined in a public officer.”[10]
In 1871, Slattery narrowly
missed an election to associate judgeship. In September 1873, the Labor Reform
Convention for Schuylkill County offered his name as a candidate for state
senator. Three years later, the commonwealth arrested Slattery and charged him
with arson related to “Molly Maguire” activity. A few months after that, the
commonwealth charged Slattery with participation in a failed “Molly” conspiracy to
murder William and Jesse Major. At his wife's urging, Slattery gave prosecution testimony to save his own life.
Shenandoah
Herald, September 11, 1873
C
|
ornelius T. McHugh, Summit Hill
As president of the Summit Hill
WBA chapter, AOH bodymaster Cornelius McHugh attended WBA Grand
Council proceedings at Mauch Chunk in April 1871. New York Herald coverage of the Grand Council proceedings described
an “Immense Politico-Industrial Organization—A New Power Forming in the Land.”[11]
New
York Herald, April 12, 1871
McHugh, along with numerous
Irish Catholic colleagues, voted at Mauch Chunk for arbitration by umpire, an
early form of collective bargaining.
Mauch
Chunk Democrat, April 22, 1871
In September 1872, Carbon
County’s Labor Reform Convention elected McHugh
as secretary. In February 1874,
voters elected McHugh as one of two school directors for Mauch Chunk Township.
Three months later, the Summit Hill chapter of the Knights of St. Patrick, a
benevolent association, elected McHugh as president.
Cornelius T. McHugh |
Mauch
Chunk Coal Gazette, February 27, 1874
In October 1876, the
commonwealth arrested McHugh in connection with the alleged 1871 “Molly” murder of mine
superintendent Morgan Powell. “He is a member of the Borough School Board, the
School Tax Collector and a mine boss,” the New
York Herald said of McHugh at the time of his arrest.[12] McHugh gave prosecution testimony to save his own life.
P
|
atrick Dolan Sr., Big Mine Run
Patrick Dolan Sr., AOH
bodymaster from Big Mine Run, got caught up in the wave of “Molly” arrests in
May 1876. The commonwealth charged Dolan, along with numerous defendants, with participation in an alleged “Molly” conspiracy to reward Thomas Hurley for the murder of Gomer James. Before his arrest, Dolan
served as school director for Butler Township. The New York Sun, one of the most hostile of the New York sheets, said after Dolan’s conviction: “Patrick
Dolan, Sr., was a school director in Butler township. Probably when he gets out
of jail he will ask to be reelected that he may teach the young ideas how to
‘shoot.’”[13] Dolan served a term of imprisonment.
New York Sun, August 25, 1876
P
|
atrick
Hester, Mount Carmel
AOH county delegate and
bodymaster Patrick Hester, of Ireland’s County
Roscommon, spent the early 1870s
stumping the coal region on behalf of Richard Trevellick’s National Labor
Union, a national association of tradesmen.[14]
The father of four grown daughters, all schoolteachers, Hester owned
hotels in Mount Carmel and Locust Gap. He held positions in local office as
school director, tax assessor, township supervisor, and overseer of the poor.
Patrick Hester |
In November 1876, the commonwealth
arrested Hester along with two other AOH men for the 1868 murder of
Alexander Rea. In 1869, prosecutors had released Hester on a grant of nolle prosequi in the same case. “No
evidence was elicited against Mr. Hester at all,” the Northumberland Democrat reported on Hester’s release in 1869.[15] The commonwealth hanged Hester nine years later.
New York Sun, March 25, 1878
C
|
hristopher Donnelly, New Castle
In 1872 Christopher Donnelly, a
miner, served as delegate to the Schuylkill County Labor Reform convention. In
1873, Donnelly served as delegate to the Democratic county convention.
In August 1874, Schuylkill’s
Hibernians elected Donnelly as AOH county treasurer. That same month, Donnelly
again served as a delegate to the Democratic county convention. In that
capacity, the new AOH county officer delivered thirty-nine votes to the
successful nomination of James Reilly for U.S. Congress. Reilly secured the
congressional seat in November.[16]
In February 1876, Donnelly
secured the office of school director for New Castle. In May 1876, the
commonwealth arrested the AOH officer in connection with a failed “Molly” conspiracy to
murder William and Jesse Major. Donnelly served a term of imprisonment.
Pottsville
Standard, February 19, 1876
At least four of the five
alleged “Molly Maguires” who served as school directors, Christopher Donnelly,
Cornelius McHugh, Patrick Hester, and John Slattery, combined their spirit of
civic responsibility with labor advocacy. Donnelly and McHugh were miners.
Hester and Slattery had business concerns. All four worked for union
organization and labor reform in a hostile era, in a region determined to stop the ascendancy
of Irish Catholics to political office.
The
Enduring Spirit of Bigotry
F
|
ormer U.S. Senator Charles
Buckalew proved a formidable foe of the Hibernians prosecuted as “Mollies.”
Buckalew served as special prosecutor in the trial of Patrick Hester. Six years
before Buckalew addressed the jury in Hester’s trial at Bloomsburg, he offered
a bill on the floor of the U.S. Senate. “Senator Buckalew is still persistent
in his efforts to engraft the principle of cumulative or reformed voting upon
the statute books of the Commonwealth,” the Sunbury
American reported in early 1872. “He has renewed his bill of the last
session applying the principle to the election of school directors, and as it
was before received with much favor it will doubtless become a law.”[17]
The Northumberland Democrat printed the specifics of Buckalew’s bill,
which secured “minority representation in the organization of school boards.”[18]
It is doubtful that Buckalew’s “minority representation” embraced the notion of
Irish Catholic school directors in the coal region, where Buckalew resided.
In his
1873 correspondence to the New York
Herald, John McKeon wrote: “This spirit of bigotry is not of modern growth. From the
earliest history of our country a prejudice has existed against foreigners.” McKeon
gave the Know-Nothing oath from the 1840s, when members swore to use all means
in their power “to counteract and destroy the influence of foreigners and Roman
Catholics in the administration of the government of the United States.”[19]
“This spirit of persecution and
hostility to foreigners and Catholics is never at rest,” McKeon said in October 1873. “Within
the past few years this feeling is again forming its battalions. The pulpits of
this city and its environs have of late been resonant with sermons, inculcating
the idea that the Catholic Church is hostile to freedom, to the education of
the people and to the very existence of a republican form of government.”[20] A year after McKeon described the nativists’ concerns,, Hibernians in Pennsylvania’s coal region helped send a young Irish Catholic to U.S. Congress.
The arrests of
Pennsylvania’s AOH men as “Mollies,” including five school directors, began two years after McKeon warned New
Yorkers of the revival of the specter of nativism. Prosecutors used all means
in their power, including appeals to base ignorance and fear, to secure the
desired verdicts. Caught in this net were numerous Irish Catholic politicians, including tax assessors, tax collectors, township supervisors, and constables not mentioned in the above accounting.
As the prosecutors of the
“Molly” caseload and the early writers of its history hoped, the individual accomplishments
of the Hibernians charged with capital crimes on extremely dubious evidence were
subsumed under the powerful rubric of “Molly Maguire.” Even Eugene Debs,
writing decades later, characterized the prosecuted Irishmen as “ignorant,
rough and uncouth.”[21] So effective were the Pinkertons at selling their version of events, even labor advocate Debs, writing thirty years after the mass hangings, did not consider the possibility of innocence for the Hibernians prosecuted as Pennsylvania’s
“Molly Maguires.”
This column was posted November 9, 2016.
This column was posted November 9, 2016.
___________________________
Notes[1] For background on the American Party, see Timothy Egan, The Immortal Irishman: The Irish Revolutionary Who Became an American Hero (New York, 2016), 141-151 and 162-163.
[2] The New
York Herald reprinted the New York
Times editorial, with McKeon’s comments, on October 11, 1873.
[3] Voices
of Revolt, vol. 9, Speeches of Eugene
V. Debs (New York, 1928), 76; published in Appeal to Reason, November 23, 1907.
[4] Kevin Kenny, Making Sense of the
Molly Maguires (New York, 1998), 37.
[5] Ibid., 38.
[6] “Ten things to understand about the
Molly Maguires,” accessed November 2, 2016,
http://blog.oup.com/2013/12/ten-things-to-understand-about-the-molly-maguires/.
[7] “Molly Maguires,” accessed November 2,
2016,
http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/molly-maguires-0.
[8] New
York Herald, October 6, 1873, “KNOW-NOTHINGISM. Revival of the Native
American Party in This City and State.”
[9] Pottsville
Standard, June 29, 1872.
[10] Ibid., July 6, 1872 (italics in
original).
[11] New
York Herald, April 12, 1871.
[12] Ibid., October 23, 1876.
[13] New
York Sun, August 25, 1876.
[14] See “The ‘Molly Maguires’ and the
National Labor Union, updated September 29, 2016,
http://mythofmollymaguires.blogspot.com/p/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html.
[15] Northumberland
Democrat, May 21, 1869.
[16] For Reilly’s election, see “The ‘Molly
Kings’ and Greenback Labor Reform, updated November 2, 2016,
http://mythofmollymaguires.blogspot.com/p/the-molly-kings-and-greenback-labor_29.html.
[17] Sunbury
American, January 27, 1872.
[18] Northumberland
Democrat, February 9, 1872.
[19] New
York Herald, October 6, 1873.
[20] Ibid.
[21] Voices
of Revolt, 76.
No comments:
Post a Comment