Beau Riffenburgh’s recent biography of James McParlan, titled “Pinkerton’s Great Detective: The Amazing Life and Times of James McParland” [sic], documents the life of a detective so slippery, observers cannot even agree on the spelling of his name.
Young James
McParlan was noted as “J. McF” in early Pinkerton reports, known undercover in Pennsylvania as “James
McKenna,” and in later years spelled his name “James McParland.”
Riffenburgh
visited an impressive list of archives in support of this work. But of
McParlan’s long career, Riffenburgh concludes: “… there are more questions than
answers. It is just this elusiveness that is the essence of the Great
Detective, who was, is, and will forever more remain, an enigma.”
Was McParlan “an
enigma,” or was he simply a con man? Observers can agree on this: the truth of
McParlan’s career—and of his character—live on in the buried details of his
caseload. As that truth lived in the hearts and minds of men, long buried, who
purchased his services.
In Pennsylvania during the
1870s, a triumvirate of disappointed gubernatorial candidates helped mount the cornerstone
of McParlan’s career: the “Molly Maguire” caseload. Three successive defeats in
six years of Democratic Party candidates with close ties to anthracite coal and
railroad interests had left that party’s conservative leaders scrambling for
purchase. The politicians who suffered these losses played both direct and indirect
roles in the subsequent “Molly Maguire” trials. Simply put, these men hanged
their political enemies.
In 1869 Asa
Packer, president of the Lehigh Valley Railroad, suffered the first of these
stinging defeats. A half decade later, Packer sent his attorney, Allen Craig, to
help prosecute the “Molly Maguire” caseload.
In 1872 Charles
Buckalew, special prosecutor during the 1877 “Molly Maguire” Rea trial, lost a
bitter campaign for the governor’s chair. One coal region editor described
Buckalew’s allegiance: “Charles R.
Buckalew is acknowledged to be the attorney of the Reading railroad Company. He was their
agent while in the Senate, and Frank Gowen’s right-hand man generally.”
Gowen,
Buckalew’s promoter, served as president of the Philadelphia and Reading Railroad and chief
special prosecutor during the “Molly Maguire” trials. Gowen’s company purchased
the services of both McParlan and of a score of Pinkerton operatives who
infiltrated the coalfields and the state capital at Harrisburg during this volatile time.
In 1875 Pennsylvania ’s voters
crushed the gubernatorial bid of Cyrus Pershing, the third candidate with close
ties to Gowen. The following year, Pershing served as Schuylkill County ’s
president judge during the “Molly” trials. According to the New York Times,
Democratic Party elder Francis Hughes “engineered” Pershing’s nomination. The
year after Pershing’s defeat, Hughes served as yet another special prosecutor
in the “Molly Maguire” trials.
In 1871, smack
in the midst of the struggling candidacies of these coal region politicians,
tens of thousands of Pennsylvania ’s
Irish Catholic men organized under a new official state charter of the Ancient
Order of Hibernians (AOH). Most were also Democrats. But the political views of
these AOH men, champions of the workingmen, directly challenged those of the Gilded
Age politicians—Packer, Buckalew, Pershing and Hughes—who carried out the
“Molly Maguire” trials under Gowen’s hand.
Men
caustically—and continually—disappointed in their political ambitions mounted
the “Molly Maguire” trials. Those trials pivoted around the purchased testimony
of Pinkerton detective McParlan. McParlan’s testimony declared the AOH and a
shadowy group called the “Molly Maguires” one and the same.
Riffenburgh says
of McParlan: “… most of those who have evaluated his character based on what he
did in relation to the Molly Maguires have not truly produced assessments that
withstand impartial analysis of the full facts.”
And yet after
almost a century and a half, historians have not yet brought forward the facts
of these frustrated politicians who helped Gowen mount his “Molly Maguire”
campaign.
More than 135
years have passed since McParlan gave his “Molly Maguire” testimony. That
testimony sent dozens of influential Irish Catholic men to prison and more than a
score—including four AOH county delegates—to the gallows. Yet McParlan’s most
recent biographer, Riffenburgh, can declare this detective only “an enigma.”
If McParlan lied
in his “Molly Maguire” testimony, his long career as “Pinkerton’s Great
Detective” marks one of the most effective and murderous cons in history.
“‘What nerved
Brutus to slay Ceasar [sic]?’”
defense attorney Daniel Kalbfus asked a jury of McParlan in 1876. “‘Why did
Booth kill Lincoln ?
… ambition, that which threw Satan over the walls of heaven.’”
.